Religion and Politics: The Manhattan Declaration

Last week, a group of religious leaders released the Manhattan Declaration - a statement reaffirming the essential justice and goodness of upholding and protecting the sanctity of life, traditional marriage between a man and a woman, and of the rights of religious conscience and liberty. Although written from a Christian perspective, the ethos of the declaration conforms to the foundational Judeo-Christian heritage of our traditional American values and morality. The document urges believers and non-believers alike to recognize the evident detrimental societal ramifications caused by the steady erosion of these 3 principles. It is not written simply from a perspective of fidelity to the Christian faith, but from that of the well being of society and of love for all individuals. The declaration also calls on people of conscience to actively promote these doctrines in our American society and further to civilly resist attacks on and abandonment of these doctrines.

This point of view undoubtedly will be assailed from the left as bigotry, intolerance, and imposing church on the state. They incorrectly argue that the principle of separation of church and state that prohibits a state sponsored religion also requires a person to exclude their religious perspective from their politics. This position not only is a misunderstanding of that principle but also fails to grasp that a person’s belief system is their religion. It is their framework for understanding this world, this life, and their purpose or vocation in this life. Further, a person’s belief system intrinsically has an associated code of morality or ethics. This moral code provides an ethical standard by which a person measures the conduct of their lives. For many, this cosmologic and ethical framework arises from their belief in an eternal, omnipotent, and loving God. For others, their belief system arises from their secular understanding of the world. In either case, what they believe is their “religion.” One’s politics can not possibly be separated from one’s “religion”. It is facetious for a “non-religious” person to say that a Christian’s political position which is based in their religious beliefs should not be expressed in the political process and yet insist that their political position that is based in their secular beliefs are legitimately expressed in the political process.

Ironically while many on the progressive left claim to espouse broad tolerance of individual beliefs, they do so only as long as those beliefs conform to their beliefs. As Americans, we rightly pride ourselves in freedom of beliefs and in that sense we certainly live in a tolerant society. However, living in a free, democratic, and tolerant society does not mean that all beliefs should have equal expression in that society. Our American freedom confers the right to any citizen to utilize the political process to incorporate into our society those beliefs they consider beneficial and to exclude those they believe to be detrimental.

The principles and objectives of the Manhattan Declaration will also meet resistance from the right. Some conservatives argue that these issues of sanctity of life, traditional marriage, and religious liberty are peripheral social issues that divide and thereby weaken the conservative movement. They feel debate of these issues only distracts from the more important conservative effort to promote traditional American individual freedoms and the traditional American economic principles of free markets. This stance however, does not recognize that the same liberal ideology underlying the systematic attack on traditional American morality also underlies the attack on traditional American individual freedoms and economic principles. Progressive ideology comprehensively rejects the intrinsic, absolute, and personal nature of individual freedoms, talents, and responsibilities as understood in our Judeo-Christian heritage. Rather than primacy of the individual person and of the individual family, the progressive movement emphasizes the ascendancy of the non-personal collective society. Rather than the absolute and unchanging morality of our Judeo-Christian heritage, the progressive movement champions a changing and relative morality that “fits” with our societal and scientific “progress”. We must understand that the attack on traditional American individual freedoms and economic principles is part of the broader systemic ideological assault on all of traditional American society and must be resisted on all fronts.

We have reached a defining crossroads in our nation’s history. We can sit back and watch the “enlightened” progressive economic and moral principles insidiously supplant our traditional American principles and values; or we can each step up, and actively participate in an unprecedented grass roots political movement that embraces and promotes traditional American free market principles, individual freedoms, and morality. Please read the Manhattan declaration. It is a compelling and lucid statements. Aand, if it conforms to your beliefs, add your signature (http://manhattandeclaration.org/images/content/ManhattanDeclaration.pdf). Forward the document to those who care for traditional America. Write your congressman and senators (contact info found at http://www.conservativeusa.org/mega-cong.htm). Join and contribute your time, energy, and money as you are able to grass root organizations such as the American’s for Prosperity http://americansforprosperity.org/national-site, American Liberty Alliance http://americanlibertyalliance.com//, and other traditional American values based grass roots organizations.